makale yayımlama koşulları | abonelik | reklam | iletişim | arşiv |
|
ENDÜSTRİ
MÜHENDİSLİĞİ Temmuz - Ağustos - Eylül 2003 - Sayı 3
|
CRISIS MANAGEMENT IN TURKISH AUTOMOTIVE
INDUSTRY
Aslı SUDER, Ahmet ÇAKMAK
Istanbul Technical
University, Faculty of Management
|
ÖZET Günümüzdeki koşullarda, şirketlerin krizleri fırsat veya tehdit
olarak algılamaları kriz yönetimi ile ilgili faaliyetlerini etkilediği
görülmektedir. Kriz yönetiminde birinci derecede önem verilmesi gereken
planlama faktörüdür. Planlama, kriz yönetimi faaliyetlerinin temelini
oluşturmaktadır. İleriye dönük olarak düşünüldüğünde, krizin örgüt için
tehdit olarak algılanması planlama faaliyetleri ile ilgilenme isteğini
arttırmaktadır. Çeşitli potansiyel krizleri tanımlayabilen örgütlerin ve
planlama faaliyetlerini başlatabilenlerin olası en kötü kriz için de hazırlık
yaptıkları bilinmektedir. Bu tür hazırlıkların büyüklüğü, örgütün belirli
kriz durumlarından zarar görme olasılığı ve her olası potansiyel durumdan
etkilenmesi arasında doğrudan bağlantı bulunmaktadır. Potansiyel krizden daha
tehdit edici olan şirketin çekirdek yapısına bulunan rekabet etme gücüdür. Bu
yüzden, oluşabilecek önemli kriz
durumları için planlama çalışmasında bulunmalıdır. Böylece değerlendirme yapılırken,
erken planlama safhalarında, krizin oluşturduğu çeşitli fırsat bileşenlerini
değerlendirmeden önce, krizin tehdit eden taraflarını dikkate almalıdır.
Değişik önemli durumları fark etmek ve bu durumlara göre plan yapmak şirketi
bütün olarak etkileyecek tehditlerden koruyacaktır. Bütün bunlara rağmen bu
şekilde bir bakış açısı olası fırsatların getireceği sonuçları gözönüne
almadan gerçekleştirilememektedir. İki taraflı bir bakış açısı olarak
düşünebileceğimiz bu durum, panik yapma eğilimini azaltmakta, aynı zamanda
tehditler üzerinde yoğunlaşma şirket için faydalı olmaktadır. Türkiye
gelişmekte olan bir ülke olduğundan krizler kısa süre aralıklarla
oluşmaktadır. Belirsizlikler ve sürprizler kriz dönemlerinde yüksektir. Risk
yönetimi ve likit durumu çok önem taşımaktadır. Talep, iç pazarda azalmış ve
kriz yönetimi için alınan önlemler ihracat için büyük fırsatlar yaratmıştır.
Yöneticiler ihracat merkezli projelere öncelik vermeye çalışmışlardır. Dış
pazarlardan daha fazla gelir elde ederek faaliyetlerini bu pazarlarda
sürdürmek için çaba harcamaktadırlar. En önemli kararlar artan verimlilik ve
azalan harcamalardır. Pazarda daha çok rekabet edebilmeye, şirketin imajını
korumaya ve pazardaki değerini kaybetmemeye gayret sarfetmektedirler. Daralan
talep yüzünden otomotiv endüstrisi yöneticileri haftalık izinler vererek,
hiçbir ödeme yapmadan çalışanlarını kaybetmemeye çalışmaktadırlar. Otomotiv
endüstrisinde üretim yapanlar 1994 krizinden ders almışlardır ve 2001-2002
krizi ile mücadele ederken daha başarılı olmuşlardır. İhracat Türk otomotiv endüstrisinin
geleceğinde büyük önem taşımaktadır. Türkiye'deki iş hayatındaki ekonomik, teknolojik, psiko-sosyal ve
ekolojik çevreler giderek karmaşık, baskı yapan ve tehlike oluşturan durumlar
arzetmektedir. Bu tür çevreler örgütlerde oluşan krizleri besleyen zeminleri
oluştururlar. Böylece örgütlerdeki
stratejistler daha fazla dikkat sarfederek kriz yönetiminin fonksiyonunu
arttırmakta ve örgütlerini krizlerden koruma yollarını bulmaktadırlar.
Deneyimli yöneticiler, yeni yöneticilere bu durumlar hakkında tavsiyede
bulunmaktadırlar. Yöneticiler çoğunlukla örgütlerdeki inançları, davranışları
ve potansiyel tehlike oluşturabilecek noktaları tespit ederek bununla ilgili
önlem almalıdırlar. Bu durumlar gerçeklerle ilgili olarak dar görüşlülüğün ve
bazı davranışların örgütlerdeki krizleri oluşturduğunu göstermektedir. Türkiye gelişmekte olan bir ülke olarak ekonomik krizlerden sıkça
etkilenmektedir. Para değerinde dalgalanmaları, enflasyonu ve develüasyonu
birlikte görmekteyiz. Otomotiv endüstrisinde son krizin belirtileri 1999'da
olmuştur. 2001-2002 krizinde ise ekonomide küçülme, enflasyonda artış ve
tüketimde azalma görülmüştür. Bu durumda otomotiv endüstrisindeki üreticiler
ihracata önem vererek iç pazarda talebe göre üretimde bulunmuşlardır.
Satışları ve hizmetleri yeniden organize ederek yeni modellerin üretimine
ağırlık vermişlerdir. Türkiye'deki son krizler otomotiv endüstrisinin ihracat
kapasitesini artırmasına, aynı zamanda küresel pazarda kendi paylarını
artırma fırsatını elde etmişlerdir. ABSTRACT In today's world a company's perception of a crisis as a threat or
an opportunity does appear to influence a company's willingness to engage in
primary crisis management activities. One of the primary inputs of
comprehensive crisis management is the planning factor. Planning is at the
root of all crisis management activities. Furthermore, the perception of a
crisis as a threat increased an organization's willingness to engage in
planning activities. An organization that is able to identify a set of
possible crises is more likely to initiate planning activities in preparation
for the worst. The magnitude of such preparations seems to be a direct link
between an organization's vulnerability to certain crisis situations and its
level of perception toward each potential contingency. The more threatening a
potential crisis is to a company's core competencies, the more it should
partake in primary crisis planning activities. Thus, when evaluating, in
early planning stages, the multiple components of a crisis, a company should
assess the threatening aspects of a situation before considering crisis
opportunity components. It is important to recognize and plan for
contingencies that may directly threaten the company as a whole before
anything else. Nevertheless, such a perspective should not be without the
acknowledgment of possible opportunity outcomes. Such a dual perspective will
diminish the inclination to panic, while focusing on threats that are most
menacing to the company. Turkey is a developing country and unfortunately
economic crisis occur very frequently. Key Words: Crisis management, automotive
industry, exportation and importation, domestic market and international
markets. |
INTRODUCTION
Although many
business leaders will acknowledge that crises are a given for virtually every
business firm, many of these firms do not take productive steps to address
crisis situations. Companies generally go to great lengths to plan their
financial growth and success. But when it comes to crisis management, they
often fail to think and prepare for those eventualities that may lead to a
company's total failure. Safety violations, plants in need of repairs, union
contracts, management succession and choosing a brand name, etc. can become
crises for which many companies fail to be prepared until it is too late. The
tendency, in general, is to look at the company as a perpetual entity that
requires plans for growth. Ignoring the probabilities of disaster is not going to
eliminate or delay their occurrences. Strategic planning without inclusion of
crisis management is like sustaining life without guaranteeing life. One reason
so many companies fail to take steps to proactively plan for crisis events is
that they fail to acknowledge the possibility of a disaster occurring. They
simply choose to ignore the situation, with the hope that by not talking about
it, it will not come to pass. The companies who prepare a proactive crisis
plan, their decisions will be more rational and better received, and the crisis
will be of shorter duration [1]. Making decisions while under the stress,
excitement and dangers of a crisis situation is much harder than having to
react to a crisis in terms of a pre-approved framework. It is said that "there
are two kinds of crisis: those that you manage and those that manage you” [2].
Proactive planning helps managers to control and resolve a crisis. Ignoring the
possibility of a crisis, on the other hand, could lead to the crisis taking a
life of its own. In a business organization, symptoms or signals can alert the
strategic planners or executives of an eminent crisis. Slipping market share,
losing strategic synergy and diminishing productivity per man hour, as well as
trends, issues and developments in the socio-economic, political and
competitive environments, can signal crises, the effects of which can be very
detrimental. After all, business failures and bankruptcies are not intended.
They do not usually happen overnight. They occur more because of the lack of
attention to symptoms than any other factor.
A crisis
occurs when an event increases in intensity, falls under close scrutiny of the
news media or government, interferes with normal business operations, devalues
a positive public image, and has an adverse effect on a business's bottom line
[3]. Crises are caused by an interacting set of human, organizational, and
technological failures that combine with regulatory, infrastructure, and
preparedness shortcomings in the organizations' environments [4]. Researchers
build on the crises definition by noting that organizational crises are highly
ambiguous events that necessitate a decision or judgment that will result in
change for better or for worse [5]. Crises have dual meanings as well as dual
outcomes. Crises and crisis plans typically include four common elements: the
plan, the management team, communication, and post-crisis evaluation. These
four components together form the basis of crisis management activities, and
should figure into any comprehensive crisis plan [6].
Much of
the traditional crisis management literature stresses the fundamental
importance of implementing an enterprise-wide crisis plan. In most cases,
successful crisis resolutions stem from an organization's instilled crisis plan,
whereas most instances of mishandled crisis situations result from a company's
lack of such a plan [7]. Researchers tend to agree that organizations that
practice proactive crisis management will lessen the damage of a crisis.
Conversely, when organizations only respond to crises, the resulting damage
seems to over-shadow potential opportunities [8]. Indeed, many of these
companies believe that their company's prestige and goodwill will carry them
through any unforeseen misfortune. This may true for huge companies that also
have the financial resources to weather even the most disastrous crisis. But,
smaller, lesser-known companies must heed the fact that 80% of companies
without a comprehensive crisis plan vanish within 2 years of suffering a major
disaster [9]. Thus, it seems that a crisis plan is indeed an invaluable that
any company must take. The perception of crises may ultimately affect crisis
outcomes. Furthermore, the perception of a crisis as an opportunity or a threat
may also have significant implications. Crises are not inherently good or bad;
they are merely perceived by most as bad. Many examples reveal the severe
penalties attached to the unprepared ness of an organization [10]. Crises can
destroy a company's reputation in a concentrated time frame. The perceptions of
organizations would have been different if senior management had perceived
these threats differently, prepared accordingly, and executed differently.
Opportunities exist within any crisis situation. New leaders may emerge from a
crisis, and in most cases a crisis leads to accelerated change in business
processes that may prove advantageous in the long run [11]. Often companies
that do survive disasters are more prepared for the next one. This thought does
depend, however, on the extent of learning that the company in question absorbs
from the event. Finally, companies that do handle a crisis effectively are
generally perceived in a more positive way [12]. Many companies simply fail to
identify these potential positive outcomes. The perception of a crisis as an
opportunity should lead to an increased ability to consider various
alternatives and thus a greater extent of proactive planning. Managers
generally view opportunistic situations to be more controllable, thus including
more members into the resolution process and thereby increasing the flow of
alternatives [13]. On the other hand, the perceiving of a crisis as a threat
will cause managers to limit the amount of information they consider. Thus,
perception has the potential to influence the extent to which an organization
is willing to engage in crisis management activities.
Much of
the crisis management research today focuses on the technical aspects of
dealing with crises. The implementation of a crises plan and the strategies
involved in that plan has a great importance [14]. The formation of crisis
management teams and their relevance play a difficult role in crises situation
[15]. Many case studies detail preventive measures taken and lessons learned
[16].
STAGES OF A
CRISIS
Most crises do not occur suddenly. The
signals can usually be picked up and the symptoms checked as they emerge. A
company determined to address these issues realizes that the real challenge is
not just to recognize crises, but to recognize them in a timely fashion [17]. A
crisis can consist of four different and distinct stages [18]. The phases are
prodromal crisis stage, acute crisis stage, chronic crisis stage and crisis
resolution stage. Modern organizations are often called "organic" due
to the fact that they are not immune from the elements of their surrounding
environments. Very much like a living organism, organizations can be affected
by environmental factors both positively and negatively. But today's successful
organizations are characterized by the ability to adapt by recognizing
important environmental factors, analysing them, evaluating the impacts and
reacting to them. The art of strategic planning (as it relates to crisis
management) involves all of the above activities. The right strategy, in
general, provides for preventive measures, and treatment or resolution efforts
both proactively and reactively. It would be quite appropriate to examine the
first three stages of a crisis before taking up the treatment, resolution or
intervention stage [19].
Prodromal Crisis Stage
In
business organizations, the warning lights are always blinking. No matter how
successful the organization; a number of issues and trends may concern the
business if proper and timely attention is paid to them. As a result of the
companies ignoring the symptoms, and the financial losses that followed, caused
the company to realize that it would have been easier to manage the crisis
directly in the prodromal stage rather than trying to shift the blame.
Acute Crisis Stage
A
prodromal stage may be oblique and hard to detect, but no action was taken
until an acute stage occurred. An acute stage occurs when a symptom
"demands urgent attention".
Whether the acute symptom emerges suddenly or is a transformation of a
prodromal stage, an immediate action is required. Diverting funds and other
resources to this emerging situation may cause disequilibria and disturbance in
the whole system. It is only those organizations that have already prepared a
framework for these crises that can sustain their normal operations. The reason
why prodromes are so important to catch is that it is much easier to manage a
crisis in this stage. In the case of most crises, it is much easier and more
reliable to take care of the problem before it becomes acute, before it erupts
and causes possible complications. In an acute stage, management can only take
action to control the damage. However, the losses are incurred.
Chronic Crisis Stage
During this
stage, the symptoms are quite evident and always present. It is a period of
make or break. Being the third stage, chronic problems may prompt the company's
management to once and for all do something about the situation. It may be the
beginning of recovery for some firms, and a death knell for others. Either the
organization is so overwhelmed by prodromal and acute problems that no time or
attention is paid to the chronic problems, or the managers perceive the
situation to be tolerable, thus putting the crisis on a back burner.
Crisis Resolution
Crises
could be detected at various stages of their development. Since the existing
symptoms may be related to different problems or crises, there is a great
possibility that they may be misinterpreted. Therefore, the people in charge
may believe they have resolved the problem. However, in practice the symptom is
often neglected. In such situations, the symptom will offer another chance for
resolution when it becomes acute, thereby demanding urgent care. Studies
indicate that today an increasing number of companies are issue-oriented and
search for symptoms. Nevertheless, the lack of experience in resolving a
situation and/or inappropriate handling of a crisis can lead to a chronic
stage. There is this last opportunity to resolve the crisis at the chronic
stage. No attempt to resolve the crisis, or improper resolution, can lead to
grim consequences that will ultimately plaque the organization or even destroy
it. It must be noted that an unsolved crisis may not destroy the company. It
most be noted that an unsolved crisis may not destroy the company. But, its
weakening effects can ripple through the organization and create a host of
other complications.
PREVENTIVE
EFFORTS
The heart
of the resolution of a crisis is in the preventive efforts the company has
initiated. This step, similar to a human body, is actually the least expensive,
but quite often the most overlooked. Preventive measures deal with sensing
potential problems [20]. Major international functions of a company such as
finance, production, procurement, operations, marketing and human resources are
sensitive to the socio-economic, political-legal, competitive, technological,
demographic, global and ethical factors of the external environment. What is imminently
more sensible and much more manageable, is to identify the processes necessary
for assessing and dealing with future crises as they arise [21]. At the core of
this process are appropriate information systems, planning procedures and
decision-making techniques. A soundly based information system will scan the
environment, and gather appropriate data. Interpret this data into
opportunities and challenges, and provide a concrete foundation for strategies
that could function as much to avoid crises as to intervene and resolve them.
Preventive efforts, as stated before, require preparations before any crisis
symptoms set in. Generally strategic forecasting, contingency planning, issues
analysis, and scenario analysis help to provide a framework that could be used
in avoiding and encountering crises.
Strategic Forecasting
This
technique primarily involves predictions. These predictions are based on
assumptions that the organization is capable of adapting to new situations.
Predictions can be for an abrupt change when trends of the past are unusable
for projecting the future. Many forecasting techniques are now available to
managers, which would project precisely but miss surprise events.
Contingency Planning
Contingency
plans are alternative plans that can be put into place if events do not occur
as expected. Whereas forecasting is based on predictable, and thus reasonably
certain events, the contingency plans an organization prepares are for less
certain situations. Contingency plans are also based, to some extent, on
predictable environmental changes. Obviously, having prepared contingency plans
helps to not only safeguard a company against a crisis, but also to resolve
crisis situations as they occur.
Issues Analysis
This
approach is related to and is very much similar to contingency planning. The
purpose here to is to alert company decision-makers to evolving trends in the
external environment of a business. The business, on the other hand, steers its
efforts to make the issue advantageous to the company.
Scenario Analysis
Scenarios
are attempts to describe in detail a sequence of events which could possibly
lead to a prescribed end-state, or alternatively, to consider the possible
outcomes of present choices. Also, the scenario is a hypothetical sequence of
events designed to draw attention to causal processes and decision points [22].
Scenario analysis involves thinking about favourable and unfavourable
situations that might arise, and the company's alternatives for preventing,
facilitating or thwarting the processes that caused the situations. Scenarios
may pertain to management succession in the case of a plane crash or death,
take-over attempts and other disasters.
TURKISH
AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY
Turkey is
between Europe and Asia. Turkey's geographic situation has a strategic
importance. Turkish automotive industry has an important strategic advantage
and automotive companies from Italy, Germany, France, Japan, USA and S. Korea
have important investments. They have export capacity and especially in crisis period
this capacity helped them to survive from the crisis with less financial loss.
In Turkey production costs are lower, compared to developed EC countries.
Turkish automotive industry had begun production in 1950. Today we have 19
companies in production of which 5 are automobile producers and 14 are
commercial vehicle producers. In this industry most of the companies have
foreign partners and they produce for both domestic and international markets.
Since the beginning, production is based on commercial vehicles. There is a
high degree of competition among them. Automotive industry is trying to
increase its export capacity, because of the recent economic crisis Turkey is
going through. In these days economic conditions are very hard. Turkish Lira
has been devaluated 40 percent and percentage of inflation has increased to 50
percent. To be successful in foreign markets automotive industry has increased
its capacity and quality. There is a high degree of competition between import
automobiles and Turkish companies' automobiles. At the same time, companies
have begun to give importance to social responsibility practices. Most of the
employees in the industry are the members of labour unions and percentage of
membership is very high if we compare this industry with other industries. The
numbers of employer and employee unions are approximately the same that can be
seen as a positive indicator for the industry. Companies whose partners are
from Far East Countries, they prefer to have work place representatives, like
Mitsubishi, Hyundai, Toyota, Honda. Human resource departments also play an
important role in giving employees other financial and social supports. Number
of women workers is not at a satisfactory level that is partly due to lack of
educational possibilities. The companies in this industry provide various
facilities for their workers. Workers
prefer teamwork and this working style increases good friendship ties among
workers. Automotive industry tries to give financial support to environment
protection projects. Also, they give financial support to training and
education. Sponsorship mechanism works on some social activities and
professional seminars.
CRISIS
MANAGEMENT IN TURKISH AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY
An organization
that does not evaluate its crisis management strategy after a crisis will be
little better prepared to manage the next crisis. Thus, it is not surprising
that pre-and post-crisis activities correlate significantly with both
perception criteria. Again, the company that recognizes the dual nature of a
crisis will have a greater propensity for proactive planning and recovery,
which leads to more effective crisis management. There is a link between
external communication and the perception of a crisis as a threat and
opportunity. Although realizing the threat of a crisis, an organization will
carefully select the message content and address each specific public affected.
An organization will also benefit if it perceives the positive outcomes of a crisis,
which stem from effective crisis communication. Good external communication in
a crisis can result in favourable public perception, leading to an improved
corporate image. But this depends on the nature of the crisis. In some cases,
effective external communication will merely maintain a company's image. In any
case, a company will not benefit by perceiving a crisis entirely as a threat to
the exclusion of even considering potential opportunities. Organizations that
feel threatened tend to limit the amount of information they process and
communicate. This typically leads to negative public perception and the belief
that the company is untrustworthy. Recognizing that crises can provide
opportunities is crucial to balancing an organization's external communication
practices. Furthermore, by communicating a balanced perception of a crisis, the
organization is more likely to sway public opinion and dispel false rumours
about the severity and ultimate consequences of a crisis. Data used in this
paper have been gathered from OSD (Turkish Automotive Manufacturers
Association) that gives us the soundest numbers.
Table 1. Capacity Usage of Automotive Manufacturers - 2002

Resource: OSD (Turkish
Automotive Manufacturers Association) [24].
Turkish automotive
industry cannot use all it's capacity. In spite of exportation of vehicles and
tractors nearly there is no demand in domestic market and capacity usage ratio
is 1/4. Indicators show that exportation in commercial vehicles continues and
capacity usage is 1/3, and in tractor production capacity usage is 1/6. In
automotive parts and components manufacturers industry production is in
negative position. Capacity usage is under accepted ratios in automotive
industry. The result of this situation costs are very high in spite of
exportation. Domestic market must be in stable position at the shortest time.
Figure 1. 1990-2002 Period Automobile Production and
Exportation

Resource: OSD (Turkish
Automotive Manufacturers Association)
• In 2002 January-March period total of 66,001 vehicles
were produced.
• In domestic market, continues decreasing of demand and
production continued in limited level. Production continued as a result of
exportation of approximately a sum of 51,000 vehicles.
• If we compare 2002 January-March period with the 2001
the same period automobile production has increased 6% and a total of 44,321.
We see high decrease of demand in domestic market. Exportation of 36,000
automobiles helped to continue production in domestic market.
• Compared with 2001 in first three months commercial
vehicle production increased.
|
Minibus |
68% |
|
Bus |
41% |
|
M.
Truck |
25% |
|
Midi
bus |
11% |
|
Pickup |
1% decreased, and |
|
L.
Truck |
58% increased. |
Compared with
the last year, in 2002 January exportation increased 9.3% and importation
decreased 23%. At the same period foreign trade balance decreased 62.3% from
1,825 to 691 million US dollars. In January 2001 export/import ratio was 54.9%,
in 2002 it increased to 78.0%.
Table 2. Recent Situation of Exportation and Importation

Resource: OSD (Turkish
Automotive Manufacturers Association)
In 2001
exportation increased 94% compared with the year 2000.
In 2001
October-December period consumer credits used 75% of total sales. But sales
with credit decreased 79% in 2001 (October-December) compared with 2000 the
same period.
Figure 2. Periodical Distribution of Consumer Credits for
Light Vehicles (Per Person)

Resource: OSD (Turkish Automotive
Manufacturers Association)
Figure 3. 1990-2002 Period Total Production and Automobile
Production

Resource: OSD (Turkish
Automotive Manufacturers Association)
2002
January August period automotive industry results
Market:
• As an expected and traditional trend in 2002 August the
number of total sales are 14,877 and the number of automobile total sales are
73,08.
• In 2002 January the number of total sales are 2,396 and
in automobile industry, the number of sales in total market are only 591, nearly
decreased to critical position. Afterwards, each month sales doubled and
increased. In spite of this automotive industry has reached the lowest number
of sales in 2002 August, as we compare with last 10 years.
• This result shows that yearly sales will reach the
number behind the number in automotive industry has reached before 1990.
• The number of sales has reached ½ of last ten years
average.
• If we look at the 10 years average of the total market,
the first 8 months realized as 250,800 units and this result shows that 63%
decrease in 2002 and with sales of 91,800 units.
Figure 4. 10 Years Average of Automotive Industry

|
Months |
10 Years Average (1000 units) |
2002 (1000 units) |
2002/10 Per Year |
% |
|
January |
22,6 |
2,4 |
1/10 |
10,6 |
|
February |
27,9 |
4,5 |
1/7 |
16,1 |
|
March |
31,4 |
8,2 |
1/4 |
26,1 |
|
April |
32,6 |
12,3 |
1/3 |
37,7 |
|
May |
37,2 |
16,9 |
1/2 |
45,4 |
|
June |
35,6 |
15,9 |
1/2 |
45,7 |
|
July |
35,9 |
16,7 |
1/2 |
46,5 |
|
August |
27,6 |
14,9 |
1/2 |
54,0 |
|
8 Months |
250,8 |
91,8 |
1/3 |
36,6 |
Resource: OSD (Turkish
Automotive Manufacturers Association)
In
1992-2002 January-August periods, Light Commercial Vehicles (minibus and truck)
sales resulted as shown in Table 3.
Table 3. 1992-2002 January-August period, Light Commercial
Vehicles sales.
|
|
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
|
Domestic |
17,922 |
18,834 |
8,389 |
11,661 |
15,258 |
22,972 |
|
Imports |
10,001 |
17,457 |
5,819 |
7,174 |
18,124 |
42,422 |
|
Total |
27,923 |
36,291 |
14,208 |
18,835 |
33,382 |
65,394 |
|
Exports(%) |
36 |
48 |
41 |
38 |
54 |
65 |
|
|
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
|
Domestic |
34,743 |
27,622 |
46,158 |
23,385 |
23,337 |
|
Imports |
41,990 |
25,183 |
48,248 |
12,540 |
13,277 |
|
Total |
76,733 |
52,805 |
94,406 |
35,925 |
36,614 |
|
Exports(%) |
55 |
48 |
51 |
35 |
36 |
Resource: OSD (Turkish
Automotive Manufacturers Association)
In 2002
January - August period the total of light vehicle sales, compared with 2001 January
-August period increased 2% percent. In the same period, import light vehicle
sales increased 6% percent and the domestic production of light commercial
vehicles was the same.
• The market share
of imports realized as 36% percent in 2002.
• In 2002
January-August period total number of commercial vehicles compared with the
2001 January-August period has increased 6% percent, and the number increased
to 12,540 units to 13,277 units. The number of import sales:x
|
EEC Countries |
14% increased and |
|
East European Countries |
90% |
|
Far East Countries |
4% decreased. |
Production:
In 2002
January August period automotive industry has produced 198,386 units.
Figure 5. Automobile Production (January-August Period)

Resource: OSD, 2002